Author	Message
SPRINT	Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:13 am    Post subject: Oggie wrote: I have used both on the carbed 33, K and N look nicer but in terms of performance are too small therefore not allowing any room for trumpets, where as Pipercross look naff but work a whole lot better giving more room. I also use to use a Bmc filter when I had a air filter box and was fine , I like the fact that you can wash it and re-use unlike the standard paper ones. Here is the BMC boxer version: http://www.bmcairfilters.com/VisDetail.asp?ID=10 Via web don´t send filters to Europe, I will investigate the local dealer, thanks! SPRINT
Oggie	Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:55 pm    Post subject: I have used both on the carbed 33, K and N look nicer but in terms of performance are too small therefore not allowing any room for trumpets, where as Pipercross look naff but work a whole lot better giving more room. I also use to use a Bmc filter when I had a air filter box and was fine , I like the fact that you can wash it and re-use unlike the standard paper ones.
Ben_nz	Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:21 pm    Post subject: I've got pancakes on a 1.5TI and a K&N panel filter in a 1.7QV. Pancakes should in theory be worse, and they're pretty darn loud. But on the other hand, they're pretty darn loud!
john 33_16v	Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:42 am    Post subject: I have had the K+N panel filter in my 33 16v since 2001, and had one in my Sprint 1.5 clover for a few years too. No complaints. I like things pretty standard, so a panel filter suits me much better than a 'dog muzzle' whacked on the end of the AFM, however pancakes look good, and probably work better, on a carbed engine. John
SPRINT	Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:55 am    Post subject: K&N or Pipercross air filter??? The Pippercross option: http://www.thepipercrossshop.co.uk/paneldisplay.asp?model=14&kit=82 Model: PP1214 £ 34.11 The K&N option: www.performance-filters.co.uk Model: (33-2096) £ 35.22 I hope to know your experiencies, grazie!SPRINT www.sprintmania.com